Tuesday, August 24, 2021

Rey Leon - 8-22-2021 - Need to improve electrical systems

 

Need to improve electrical systems

Fresno Bee

August 22, 2021

Folks across the San Joaquin Valley know the hardship of blackouts all too well. As I think back on the fires and blackouts of the past year, it’s clear to me that not only do we need to invest in clean energy, but we also need to improve the infrastructure that delivers our electricity.

As extreme weather events become more common due to climate change; reliable electricity infrastructure is more important than ever. Unreliable infrastructure hurts our communities, our economy, and the most vulnerable among us. Blackouts disproportionately impact our state’s low-income families, for whom something like losing a fridge full of groceries may be felt for months after.

Clean energy adoption is also especially impactful on marginalized communities. California’s clean energy sector generates enough electricity to power 6.9 million homes, avoiding over 15 million metric tons of CO2 emissions per year. This has huge implications for all of us, but especially for poor communities of color in the San Joaquin Valley who often face higher exposure to air pollution.

California has done an excellent job of establishing visionary climate goals, but we still have more work to do to shore up our energy infrastructure.

– Rey Leon,

Huron mayor

https://eedition.fresnobee.com/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&edid=034b9756-bd4b-443f-b234-def90941d6f6 

Andrea Farber De Zubiria - 8-18-2021 - Carbon Fees? You Might Be Surprised by Latest List of Supporters

 Carbon Fees? You Might Be Surprised by Latest List of Supporters

August 18, 2021

GV Wire

Here’s a climate quiz question: What do these influential people and organizations have in common?  Elon Musk, the National Ski Association, the League of Women Voters, Fetzer Winery, Trout Unlimited, the Carnegie Institute of Science, the World Bank, all four living former Federal Reserve chairs including Janet Yellin, the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce,  the American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO and at least 3,500 economists including 28 Nobel laureates?

Answer: They all support putting a price on carbon emissions to help solve the climate change crisis.

Putting a Price on Carbon

The reason they all support putting a price on carbon is simple: If we have a national price on carbon, companies that produce or sell coal, oil or gas will be assessed a gradually rising fee for every ton of carbon pollution their product will emit. This fee will incentivize them to transition to renewable non polluting practices and products.

The U.S. Conference of Mayors, a network of 1,407 mayors from cities with populations over 300,000 passed a resolution about this. The resolution “strongly urges the United States Congress to pass legislation that imposes a price on carbon emissions sufficient enough to reduce carbon emissions in line with ambitions detailed in the Paris Agreement.” The resolution cites our changing climate’s “challenges to human health and safety, quality of life, and the rate of economic growth.”

I feel heartsick every time I hear about extreme fires, storms, floods and the horrific damage they are wreaking on people’s lives. We all know that particles in the smoke that wafts into our Valley are damaging to our health.

Majority of Americans Want Action

Many of the same emissions that cause climate change also lead to air quality problems. The vast majority of Americans want action on climate and air pollution. But many of our leaders are too afraid to support bold legislation to help us transition away from these fuels that are heating up the earth and trashing the air we breathe.

The good news is that even without federal legislation, the US is gradually increasing its use of solar, wind, biofuels and geothermal energy. According to the US Energy Information Administration, 12% of our energy consumption was provided by renewables in 2020.

Carbon Pricing Will Spur Innovation

It is exciting and hopeful that we are increasing our use of clean energy. History shows that the more we use certain technologies, the more they improve. But experts say this isn’t happening fast enough to meet the urgent goal of lowering greenhouse gases 50% by 2030 to stabilize our climate. A huge number of economists, scientists and public policy experts say that we need carbon pricing to motivate more innovation and efficiency.

Canada has already passed this legislation. The European Union will soon start assessing a fee on products we export to them if a carbon fee is not already part of our economy. This could put American businesses at a disadvantage if our products wind up costing too much. Carbon pricing can take effect much faster than any regulations to lower emissions with minimal bureaucracy and no cost to taxpayers.

What Can ‘Ordinary People’ Do? 

Between August 11 and  August 31 we have our best opportunity ever to get carbon pricing at the federal level through the process called “budget reconciliation”.

If enough concerned citizens contact their representatives in the next few weeks, we could have a carbon price by fall and start to see carbon emissions drastically drop in a matter of months.

It takes five minutes to let your member of Congress know you want carbon pricing by contacting them using cclusa.org/house. The link will get you addresses, phone numbers and sample scripts and does not obligate you to any future actions, memberships, emails or donation requests.

Calls to Congress Needed

Last week over 20,000 people contacted their senators to ask for a price on carbon. Now Citizens’ Climate Lobby estimates we need at least 10,000 people to call and email their representative in the House to get their attention, as well. We need to do this before they look at the budget reconciliation package that the Senate will be passing on to them in a few weeks.

Whether your member of Congress is Jim Costa, David Valadao, Devin Nunes or Kevin McCarthy, reach out to them by the end of August to let them know you have had it with lack of action on climate change and want a price on carbon emissions now.

You can find more influencers and organizations that support a price on carbon here.

Andrea Farber De Zubiria is the co-leader of the Fresno Chapter of Citizens’ Climate Lobby.  Citizens’ Climate Lobby is a non-partisan non-profit organization that empowers ordinary people to influence Congress to address climate change with effective federal legislation. She can be reached at fresno@citizensclimatelobby.org

https://gvwire.com/2021/08/18/carbon-fees-you-might-be-surprised-by-latest-list-of-supporters/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Valley+Air+District+to+End+Ag+Burns&utm_campaign=FTF+08%2F23%2F2021


Devin Carroll - 8-15-2021 Put Carbon Price on Natural Gas

Put Carbon Price on Natural Gas

Fresno Bee August 15, 2021

 My Congressman, Devin Nunes, recently introduced HR 4394, the Clean Energy Protection Act, mandating continued operation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. 

All 10 California Republican Representatives are cosponsors.

I agree closing Diablo Canyon is a mistake; probably leading to more use of natural gas plants. Keeping it would allow new solar and wind power to replace fossil fuels. Nuclear actually works well in tandem with intermittent renewable sources. 

I respect my fellow environmentalists who are leery of nuclear power, but many are changing their minds. The Union of Concerned Scientists is just one organization giving qualified support of nuclear energy as better than coal or gas power plants. 

But no bill is helpful unless it passes. Demanding Diablo Canyon stay open, “notwithstanding” California laws, will attract no Democratic votes. Other Republican initiatives, such as streamlining regulations, and developing safer nuclear designs, could be bipartisan. 

The best policy to help nuclear power is a price on carbon. It was PG&E that requested shutdown for economic reasons, largely cheap natural gas. But gas is “subsidized” unless it pays a price for damage to our climate from CO2 and methane. A carbon price establishes market-based competition to eliminate these greenhouse gases.

Devin Carroll

https://eedition.fresnobee.com/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&edid=8f3402b3-cffb-4137-bd00-490b260cecc7




Friday, August 6, 2021

Ken Wall - 7-13-2021 - Fresno writer outlines plan to reverse climate change and halt its bad impacts

 Fresno writer outlines plan to reverse climate change and halt its bad impacts

BY KEN WALL

JULY 13, 2021 11:34 AM

The vast majority of Americans, no matter their party affiliation, are worried about climate change. We want our government to take action to cut greenhouse gas emissions without damaging our livelihoods, our access to goods and services, and our ability to get from point A to point B.

How can we do this quickly enough to hit the net zero emissions goal for 2050? It is clear to me that national legislation is the key to effectively tackling climate change in time to avoid the worst consequences of the changing climate.

As a former bank regulator, I know how difficult it is to establish regulations that “get it right.” This is one reason that I agree with most economists who have concluded that a market-based approach, rather than a regulatory approach, is the most effective way to transition the economy away from fossil fuels to clean energy. And of the market-based options that have been proposed, I am convinced that what we need is a form of carbon pricing called Carbon Fee and Dividend.

Carbon Fee and Dividend, as envisioned in The Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (HR 2307), would be more effective overall in addressing our reliance on fossil fuels. It would be far simpler and cheaper to implement than regulatory approaches, and it would be more fair to all U.S. residents. By setting a gradually rising fee on each ton of CO2 produced, companies will have a powerful incentive to innovate ways to emit less carbon.

While any carbon pricing system would increase energy costs for U.S. residents, it is the “dividend” part of the measure that would ensure that lower-income residents especially do not suffer financially as a result. Projections show that the dividend amounts would more than cover the higher energy costs of almost all lower-income residents.

Ken Wall

https://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/readers-opinion/article252757623.html