Saturday, September 2, 2017

Connie Young - 8/31/2017 - Hold climate deniers accountable for ‘willful ignorance and arrogance’

Hold climate deniers accountable for ‘willful ignorance and arrogance’ 

August 31, 2017

As we choke on the bad air and swelter in Fresno, as Oregon burns and Houston drowns, remember the names of the politicians who ignored the warnings of climate scientists. They must be held accountable for their willful ignorance and arrogance while the lives, livelihoods and property of some of our most vulnerable citizens are destroyed.

You can help by urging your members of Congress to join the bipartisan House Climate Solutions Caucus and to support effective climate legislation, like carbon fee and dividend (https://citizensclimatelobby.org/basics-carbon-fee-dividend/).

We must let them know we are watching.

Connie Young, Fresno

 https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2093055593842196191#editor/target=post;postID=5995972060547282495

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article170336047.html#storylink=cpy


Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Don Gaede - 8/2/2017 - California leads way in clean energy

California leads way in clean energy

August 02, 2017 2:34 PM
Russell Harland’s letter of July 28, referring to the recent cap-and-trade extension, claimed “California isn’t being a leader. California is being left behind.”
But let’s check the facts. California’s job growth has outpaced that of the national economy for years. Our state has far more clean-energy jobs than there are coal jobs in all of America. Our GDP has risen more than 30 percent in the last 15 years, while our CO2 emissions have declined.
Mr. Harland is correct in implying that climate action limited to California and Australia will not be enough to solve this global problem. The Paris Climate Accord, signed by 195 nations, showed us that virtually the entire world is convinced climate change is a real and present danger. California is perfectly positioned to be at the forefront of new technologies to address that threat.
We have a long-standing reputation for showing the way for our nation and the rest of the world. Fortunately, our reputation remains intact.

Don Gaede
 http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article161869613.html

Ray West - 7/23/2017 - Renewable energy is quantum leap into the future


Renewable energy is quantum leap into the future

Before World War II, there were more people employed making candy in the United States than making airplanes. The war drove the productive capacity of the nation and transformed the aerospace industry into an economic and technical powerhouse, improving the lives of people in previously unimagined ways.
That industry spun off advances in materials, communication, digital processing, space exploration and more.
Whether we are aware of it or not, we are at war again.
I do not mean ISIS or terrorism, grave though those threats are. We are at war with the earth. The planet and the implacable laws of nature are trying to slowly kill us.
We must rally the human resources of our country and world again and and create new industries based on cheap, clean, renewable energy. By doing this, we will both protect our environment and take another quantum leap into the future.
RAY WEST, SPRINGVILLE
July 23, 2017
 

Connie Young - 7/2017 - unpublished - Cap and Trade




I agree with the Bee’s editorial in praise of our governor and legislators for continuing cap and trade. ( http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/editorials/article162494933.html )
However, when it comes to national climate change legislation, I’d recommend that Congress pass carbon fee and dividend legislation such as proposed by Citizens' Climate Lobby. Here’s why: 
A steadily-rising fee on carbon emissions would be more predictable than cap and trade’s fluctuating permit prices. Businesses like predictability. 
Cap and trade is complicated and its pricing is determined behind closed doors. By comparison, carbon fee and dividend would collect predetermined fees from fossil fuel producers and distribute the proceeds equally to U.S. households. Using existing mechanisms for collecting and distributing money would preclude any need for new bureaucracies.
Carbon fee and dividend would enable consumers, rather than regulators, to decide which energy sources they use.
Finally, a border adjustment would level the playing field for U.S. and foreign businesses while encouraging other countries to implement comparable carbon pricing.  
Carbon fee and dividend: predictable, easy to administer, market-based and can be implemented worldwide. What’s not to like?

Connie Young
unpublished, July 2017

Twyla Smith - 7/20/2017 - There is hope for the planet in renewable energy

There is hope for the planet in renewable energy

Renewable energy such as solar power will protect the environment.
Renewable energy such as solar power will protect the environment. Kurt Strazdins
Was anyone surprised to learn Fresno is on the verge of breaking its heat record? Sixteen of the 17 warmest years on record have occurred since 2001, with 2016 the warmest year ever recorded..
NASA cites global warming as the main cause of shrinking ice sheets, extreme weather events, decreased snow cover and the warming and acidification of oceans. This last effect is quite visual – 50 percent of the world’s coral reefs are now bleached, leaving seascapes filled with white skeleton-like structures devoid of life and color.
Meanwhile, President Trump has abdicated America’s leadership role in solving the problem by withdrawing from the Paris Accord. He ignores our military leaders, who report extreme weather patterns are aggravating social tensions, destabilizing regions and feeding the rise of extremist groups such ISIS; and that 128 military bases are threatened by rising sea levels… or already flooding.
Truly, the image of Nero fiddling while Rome burns could not be more apt. But there is still hope! While all positive action helps, only a true carbon dividend plan will use our own sense of self-interest to decrease greenhouse emissions, promote renewable energy and reduce health and security issues while growing our economy.

Twyla Smith
Madera
July 20, 2017

Pete Moe - 7/18/2017 - Trump, Nunes dump on climate change, yet – whoops there it is – in defense bill



Trump, Nunes dump on climate change, yet – whoops there it is – in defense bill

July 18, 2017 4:23 PM

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article161869613.html#storylink=cpy

 


Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article161869613.html#storylink=cpy

Cynthia Mahoney & Don Gaede - 7/12/2017 Modesto Bee - Cynthia Mahoney and Don Gaede: Cows are the ‘canaries’ of our Central Valley

In Modesto Bee

Cynthia Mahoney and Don Gaede: Cows are the ‘canaries’ of our Central Valley

ead more here: http://www.modbee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article160961369.html#storylink=cpy

July 12, 2017 11:32 AM

Read more here: http://www.modbee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article160961369.html#storylink=cpy


http://www.modbee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article160961369.html

Dr. Cynthia Mahoney, Contra Costa; Dr. Don Gaede, Fresno
Medical Society Consortium On Climate & Health

Read more here: http://www.modbee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article160961369.html#storylink=cpy

Bruce Ratcliffe - 7/2017 unpublished - Vanilla?

Vanilla?

     Today’s Reader Challenge: Which headline doesn’t belong?
A)  “Drought pushing toward fifth year”
B)  “Fresno sets record for heat, this time 108 degrees”
C)  “Sierra snowpack expected to be smallest on record”
D”  “California snowpack at drought-busting 173 percent”
E)  “Vanilla bean shortage in Madagascar drives up prices in U.S.”
ANSWER: None of the above.  NASA scientists have predicted that extreme
weather will be an inevitable consequence of rising CO2 levels.  This
prediction was made in detail in the highly respected journal, “Science”
in 1981.  Yes, climate scientists got it right 36 years ago. Since then,
they’ve been filling in the frightening details of human-caused climate
change.
     So what does climate change have to do with the price of vanilla? 
Scientists have long predicted more extreme storms (think:  Katrina,
Sandy, Enawo).  Enawo? This year, cyclone Enawo rendered half a million
people in Madagascar homeless. But who cares about Madagascar? Well,
climate change will cause unexpected, unpleasant consequences
worldwide.  In this case, the vanilla crop was severely damaged, causing
the price of vanilla on the world market to rise 600%.  Top quality
vanilla ice cream in Fresno now sells for $9 a pint.  Global climate
change has global consequences.

Bruce Ratcliffe
Fresno
July 2017

Connie Young - 6/13/2017 - Fresno climate change activists speak to Congress today


Fresno climate change activists speak to Congress today


June 13, 2017 12:25 PM 


Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article155926924.html#storylink=cpy

Loren Alving - 6/6/2017 - Trump aside, America will battle climate change

 

Trump aside, America will battle climate change

 
Admiral James Stradvidis said “fighting climate change is the ultimate team sport.” By withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement, President Trump put the world’s strongest player on the bench, leaving the rest of the team alone to take on a very tough opponent: climate change.
While our president may have ceded our leadership role on this team, many Americans are not willing to do so. Fortunately, they have found other ways to level the playing field and continue the fight.
The Bee editorial (online June 1) expertly laid out what California is doing to further the fight on climate change. Other U.S. cities and states have pledged to honor and uphold the commitments in the Paris accord. The House of Representatives now has 40 members in its Climate Solutions Caucus (which purposefully has equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats). In the few days since the announcement, the business community, including oil companies such as Exxon, have pledged to uphold their commitments.
America is not ready to sit on the bench. Even without leadership at the top, the fight will continue from the ground up. As French President Emmanuel Macron has said, “Let’s make our planet great again!”

Loren Alving
June 6, 2017

Don Gaede - 6/5/2017 - Doctors warn Trump about climate change, but he won’t listen

Doctors warn Trump about climate change, but he won’t listen

President Trump is exiting the Paris climate accord AMA – against medical advice. He reminds me of a man who comes to the emergency room with crushing chest pain, is about to be wheeled to the cardiac cath lab for life-saving treatment, but then exclaims, “Hold everything, doc! I just talked to my brother-in-law, and he says it’s just indigestion. So I’m outta here!”
The Medical Society Consortium, a group of national medical societies representing 400,000 clinical practitioners, has come together this year to spread the word that “Climate change is harming Americans today, and these harms will increase unless we act.”
Our country needs to remain in the Paris climate accord for the sake of our health, and even more importantly, for the health of our children and grandchildren.
Don H. Gaede, M.D., Fresno
June 5, 2017

Twyla Smith - 5/26/2017 - Canada’s energy plan may be our model for future

Canada’s energy plan may be our model for future


Russell Harland’s recent letter (May 10) regarding fossil fuels vs. renewal energy ignores the massive handouts the fossil fuel industry has enjoyed for many decades. He contends that renewal energy companies shouldn’t need subsidies to be competitive.
It’s true renewables are beginning to get a bigger slice of the pie – and they should. Who wouldn’t prefer to support energy sources that free us from increasing reliance on foreign countries and from the pollution, environmental degradation and health consequences of fossil fuels?
When examining the energy programs of Australia and Canada, Mr. Harland fails to look at the whole picture. Canada’s impending plan is based on British Columbia’s, which has been in place since 2008, and has lowered carbon emissions while their economy kept pace with the rest of the country. It’s been a success and remains very popular.
Sadly, by failing to return the monies collected back to their people, the Australian plan was doomed. The lesson learned is that the “dividend” component of any carbon fee is absolutely necessary to protect both consumers and the economy.
Canada’s plan, once proved successful, could be our model for the future.

Twyla Smith

Tom Lambert - 5/20/2017 - Eliminate all energy subsidies, including fossil fuels

Eliminate all energy subsidies, including fossil fuels

May 20, 2017

Russell Harland argues in his letter May 9 that if solar and wind power were competitive, they would not need subsidies. Yet between 1950 and 2010, the federal government provided $594 billion of subsidies for fossil fuels compared with $74 billion for renewables according to a 2011 study commissioned by the Nuclear Energy Institute.
In addition, Americans spend $120 billion per year on health-care costs associated with burning fossil fuels, an indirect subsidy to the fossil fuel industry. The National Academy of Sciences estimated this hidden subsidy at 3.2 cents per kWh for coal in 2005. Other estimates are as much as tenfold that cost. If fossil fuels are competitive, why do they need such subsidies?
Mr. Harland has a valid point about subsidies, though. Let’s stop all subsidies and price energy according to true costs, including health care, by adding a fee for each ton of carbon produced. Rather than subsidizing anything, return that fee to the American people and let us spend it where we want. When people pay the true costs for their energy, without subsidies, there is no question that renewables will win. And so will the American people.
Tom Lambert, Yosemite National Park


Twyla Smith - unpublished 5/2017 - Fossil Fuels vs. Renewal Energy


I’m writing in response to Russell Harland’s recent letter regarding fossil fuels vs. renewal energy.  Mr. Harland contends renewal energy companies shouldn’t need subsidies to be competitive; ignoring the massive hand-outs the fossil fuel industry has enjoyed for many decades. 
It’s true renewables are beginning to get a bigger slice of the pie—and they should.  Who wouldn’t prefer to support energy sources that free us from increasing reliance on foreign countries, and from the pollution, environment degradation and health consequences of fossil fuels? 
When examining the energy programs of Australia and Canada, I believe Mr. Harland fails to look at the whole picture.  Canada’s soon to be implemented plan is based on British Columbia’s, which has been in place since 2008, and has lowered carbon emissions while their economy kept pace with the rest of the country.  It’s been a success, and remains very popular!
Sadly, by failing to return the monies collected back to their people, the Australian plan was doomed.  The lesson learned is that the “dividend” component of any carbon fee is absolutely necessary to protect both consumers and the economy.
Canada’s plan, once proved successful, could be our role model for the future.

Twyla Smith
May 2017

Pete Moe - 5/3/2017 - When will Rep. Devin Nunes figure out fossil fuels are yesterday’s power?


When will Rep. Devin Nunes figure out fossil fuels are yesterday’s power?

May 03, 2017 12:02 PM

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article148388364.html#storylink=cpyRenewable, clean energy is the energy of the future. Our political leaders need to get on board with this concept, or get left behind in the international race for innovative and job-creating energy sources.
Pete Moe, Clovis

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article148388364.html#storylink=cpy

Pete Moe, Clovis

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article148388364.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article148388364.html#storylink=cpy
http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article148388364.html

Bruce Ratcliffe - 4/2017 unpublished - Out of Sight

Out of Sight. . .
     With rainfall and Sierra snowpack around 170% of normal, Governor
Brown has declared California’s drought over–but not in the San Joaquin
Valley.  Huh?   Consider these facts:  The Central Valley is the world’s
largest patch of Class One soil, the best for crops, and produces about
40% of the country’s fruits, nuts and vegetables.  Unfortunately, our
agricultural practices are not sustainable.  The drought has led
desperate farmers to sink wells deeper than their neighbors–a race to
the bottom.  Mark Cowin, director of California’s Department of Water
Resources (DWR) recently stated,  “Because of increased pumping,
groundwater levels are reaching record lows – up to 100 ft lower than
previous records.”
     Some say we should build more dams–storage in case of another
drought.  But we already have more than enough storage.  DWR estimates
our total underground storage capacity is twenty times greater than all
California’s reservoirs put together.  We’ve been blessed with a huge,
but shrinking, water “savings account”.   We’ve been making many more
withdrawals than deposits.  We’re still suffering from a drought, but
it’s hiding underground.  Until we refill the Valley’s water table to
pre-drought levels, OUR drought will not be over.  Call it “saving for a
non-rainy day.”
Bruce Ratcliffe
April 2017

Connie Young - 3/30/2017 - There is a sensible response to climate change

There is a sensible response to climate change

March 30, 2017 4:39 PM

Don Gaede - March 15, 2017 - Take a tip from Reagan: Help the environment


Take a tip from Reagan: Help the environment


Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt said he doesn’t think human activity is a primary contributor to global warming: “We need to continue the debate and continue the review and the analysis.”
In the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan was confronted with scientific evidence that manmade chemicals were depleting Earth’s ozone layer. Although he didn’t have 100 percent proof, he acted anyway, and signed the Montreal Protocol. The protocol called on all nations to transition to chemicals that did not harm our atmosphere. As it turned out, Reagan acted just in time, and the ozone hole is shrinking.
We now have NASA and many major scientific bodies saying human CO2 is warming our planet. We don’t have 100 percent proof, but there’s enough evidence for prudent, conservative people to act – call it an insurance policy.
Former Reagan Secretary of State George Schultz has written, “We all know there are those who have doubts about the problems presented by climate change. But if these doubters are wrong, the evidence is clear that the consequences, while varied, will be mostly bad, some catastrophic.”
Let’s be Reaganesque, and take out an insurance policy – just in case Mr. Pruitt is wrong.

Don Gaede, Fresno
March 15, 2017

 http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article138562523.html

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article138562523.html#storylink=cpy

Connie Young - unpublished March 2017 - Sharing good news.

I'd like to share some news that gives me hope in these troubled times.

Two more members of Congress have joined the House Climate Solutions Caucus. This is a bipartisan group in the US House of Representatives which will explore policy options that address the impacts, causes, and challenges of our changing climate. Beginning only last year with just two members, it’s membership has already grown to twenty-eight. Members must join in pairs...one Republican, one Democrat. 

I take heart in knowing that a growing number of legislators are willing to set aside their political differences to work together on the challenges posed climate change. Rising temperatures and sea levels are already threatening our food and water supplies, air quality, forests, oceans, and coastlines (including military bases). We simply cannot afford to keep kicking this problem down the road.

I applaud these courageous members of Congress who are putting national security above party loyalty. Who of our local members of Congress will be the first to reach across the aisle for the honor of representing the San Joaquin Valley on this important caucus?

Connie Young

Bruce Ratcliffe - unpublished February 2017 - Earth First!

Earth First!
     Recently astronomers announced the discovery of seven Earth-size
planets orbiting a nearby star.  They’re excited about looking for
evidence that life has evolved there.  Perhaps they need not waste their
time.
     Consider: there are 100 billion stars in our galaxy.  SETI (Search
for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence) has been looking for life out there
for half a century.  The basic idea is that any civilization advanced
enough to have invented radio would now be sending out a steady “I’m
here!” (Think: Dr. Seuss’ Horton Hears a Who”) signal. This would be
easily picked up with SETI’s extremely sensitive radio telescopes.
     So far?--nothing. Hmmmm.
     Here’s a sobering theory: Any civilization with modern electronics
would require lots of electricity to run, electricity generated by, say,
burning of fossil fuels.  They became so addicted to the lifestyle that
oil made possible, they couldn’t cut back even when it became clear
where they were heading.  Rising CO2 levels caused runaway heating of
their planet, cooked everyone.
     Citizens’ Climate Lobby has a workable plan to stop global warming
before it stops us.  Let’s make Earth be the first planet to avoid the
fate that brought civilizations on all the others to an end.

Bruce Ratcliffe

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Devin Carroll - February 23, 2017 - Conservatives address climate change with cash

Conservatives address climate change with cash

February 23, 2017

Republicans seek market solutions to our problems. They now have a conservative plan to slow emissions of carbon dioxide, which causes climate warming.

The Climate Leadership Council just released “The Conservative Case for Carbon Dividends.” Each family receives a dividend of thousands of dollars annually. The money comes from taxes on carbon fuels.
 
But regulations on these fuels would be rolled back, to let the market work its magic.

Current regulations require auto companies to average 54.5 mpg by 2025.

With a carbon tax, one company might focus on larger vehicles, improving mileage but not meeting the old government standard. Another company could focus on electrics and hybrids and beat the standard.

The entire market would be pushed toward fuel savings, with businesses free to chart their own strategies.

Americans will conserve to help their budgets, and to contribute patriotically to the public good. Inventors and entrepreneurs will flourish by producing new technologies. The American economy will grow because green energy creates more jobs than fossil fuels.

All of the CLC leaders are conservative Republicans. Please encourage your congressional representatives to look at this plan.

Devin Carroll, Fresno

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article134555804.html#storylink=cpy

 

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Vicki Hellenas - February 1, 2017 - Frenzied president: Slow down, talk less and listen more.



 Frenzied president: Slow down, talk less and listen more.
 February 1, 2017
The flurry of action in the government ending the first week of President Trump’s reign is worrisome. So far, much of the White House directive has not seemed well thought out or supportive of the enlightened and humane trend we are used to in addressing social injustice, human rights, climate and other problems, at home or abroad.

At times, it has appeared our new president sits at his desk and brandishes his pen like a corporate CEO. America is not a business enterprise. Just one hotbed issue, such as remaking energy policy along low-carbon lines, or establishing new guidelines to vet incoming immigrants, could feasibly consume months of planning and development.

Now, abruptly it seems, we have life-changing directives being fired off after less than two weeks in office. What is fueling this frenetic activity coming out of the White House? Trump’s senior advisers seem unable to slow him down. Or perhaps, the leadership around the leader hasn’t noticed that the chaos and protests across the country are growing louder?

Trump works for America now. He is no longer a CEO in the corporate mold. He needs to slow down, talk less, and listen more.

Vicki Hellenas, Fresno

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article129942914.html#storylink=cpy



http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article129942914.html

Monday, January 23, 2017

Ruth Afifi - January 21, 2017 - Combating climate change is good for economy


Combating climate change is good for economy


Jim Patterson, my Republican Assemblyman, opposes any spending on what he calls Gov. Jerry Brown’s “climate change gamble.” In an email to constituents Jan. 10, Patterson says that climate change is just a theory, and efforts to reduce carbon emissions have “huge consequences to freedom, opportunity, prosperity and job creation, the cost-of-living and economic upward mobility.”
Patterson seems unaware that the U.S. economy grew by 10 percent between 2008 and 2015 while carbon dioxide emissions from the energy sector fell by 9.5 percent. Obviously, combating climate change has not led to lower growth or a lower standard of living.
Patterson also seems unaware that twice as many Americans have jobs related to clean energy compared to the 1.1 million Americans who are producing fossil fuels and generating electric power with them.
Not all Republicans share Patterson’s disdain for reducing carbon emissions and moving away from fossil fuels. In 2006, Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act (Assembly Bill 32) and several Republicans have joined the bipartisan congressional Climate Solutions Caucus. Patterson should reconsider his views on climate change and what we can do about it.
Ruth Afifi, Fresno
January 21, 2017
http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article127751284.html

 

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article127751284.html#storylink=cpy

Thursday, January 12, 2017

Don Gaede & Alexander Sherriffs - January 10, 2017 - Bird captures impact of climate change on public health

Bird captures impact of climate change on public health 

January 10, 2017

Hats off to Dr. Ken Bird, Fresno County’s Public Health Officer, for highlighting the importance of climate change in last month’s online newsletter To Your Health. This outstanding series has previously shed light on important public health issues like the nationwide opioid epidemic, hepatitis C, and the insufficient numbers of health care providers in our Valley.
In his December article, Dr. Bird writes, “We in Fresno County and the Valley cannot afford to ignore climate change and its health consequences . . . We are very much more at risk (from climate change) due to the bowl-like topography of our environment, the tenuous nature of our water supply, and our economic dependence upon agriculture.”
Dr. Bird’s call to action echoes that of several other health organizations: the American Public Health Association declared 2017 to be “The Year of Climate Change and Health,” and the American College of Physicians recently issued a call for physicians to “help combat climate change by advocating for effective climate change adaptation and mitigation policies.” Our Fresno-Madera Medical Society and the California Medical Association endorsed similar policies this past year.

Thank you, Dr. Bird, for keeping us informed about these timely topics.

Don Gaede, M.D., and Alexander Sherriffs, M.D., Fresno

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article125435499.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article125435499.html#storylink=cpyThank you, Dr. Bird, for keeping us informed about these timely topics.
Don Gaede, M.D., and Alexander Sherriffs, M.D., Fresno

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article125435499.html#storylink=cpy

 

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Bruce Ratcliff - January 6, 2017 - Shake-up call: We aren’t helpless against climate change

Shake-up call: We aren’t helpless against climate change 

 January 6, 2017

One hopes our recent earthquake will serve as a shake-up call to those who believe we humans are in charge of the planet. Everything from the pyramids to the interstate highway system shows we’re the top dog around here, right? But no. Mother Nature is in the driver’s seat.
Though we can prepare for nature’s disasters like earthquakes, we can’t stop them – just like climate change, right? But no. Recent extreme weather events – record rainfalls, hurricanes, droughts; global temperatures rising, cannot be blamed on Mother Nature. We’re in the driver’s seat (literally) for this one.
Fortunately, we humans can slow, even stop climate change. A sensible plan to do just that has been proposed by Citizens’ Climate Lobby: a slowly increasing fee on fossil fuels, all returned to the public, that uses a free-market solution to get citizens to cut their fossil fuels consumption voluntarily.
One morning back in 1957, I was caught exactly half way between my friend’s house and mine during the worst earthquake since the 1906 San Francisco temblor. I froze, helpless, paralyzed by fear. We needn’t feel helpless – or hopeless – about climate change. We caused it; we can cure it.

Bruce Ratcliffe, Fresno

Read more here: http://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/article125000354.html#storylink=cpy

 

Twyla Smith December 18, 2016 Congress’ bipartisan work on water sets good example for climate change

Congress’ bipartisan work on water sets good example for climate change

 December 18, 2016 11:50 AM