State Sen. Grove omitted key points in her Bee op-ed about oil production in California
Fresno Bee - September 17, 2023
In a recent opinion piece in The Bee (Aug. 30), Republican state Sen. Shannon Grove of Bakersfield (who represents parts of Fresno County) presented a case for expanded oil exploration and production in California. Her argument centers on the fact that California does not currently supply enough oil for the state’s energy needs.
In her piece, Grove brought up Ecuador, where on Aug. 20 the voters approved (with 59 percent of the vote) a referendum calling for the prohibition of oil production in a portion of Yasuni National Park. The park encompasses a wildly diverse portion of the Amazon rain forest and is home to several indigenous tribes (North American Congress on Latin America).
The referendum in question apparently culminated a decade’s worth of effort that started with those indigenous people who were fighting to preserve their homeland from the ravages of oil companies and from the loggers that followed. The tribes were eventually joined by environmentalists and others, who mounted a grassroots campaign resulting in the voters’ approval of the referendum. The measure was vigorously opposed by the Ecuadoran state-run oil company, government officials and citizens concerned about the loss of potential oil exports and oil-based jobs.
Grove mentioned the Ecuadoran referendum because she sees it as an argument in favor of expanded oil efforts in California, since California depends on oil imports from other countries, Ecuador being one, to satisfy current demand for oil-based energy. Her argument is that less oil from Ecuador means California should produce more for its own use (apparently California doesn’t use much oil from other U.S. states).
Contrary to Grove’s claim, reports indicate that oil produced in California is among the most polluting in the world (Center for Biological Diversity, June 28, 2021). It is also worthy of note that petroleum workers (drillers and refiners) suffer a relatively higher degree of serious health problems (National Library of Medicine, April 4, 2021).
Petroleum workers aren’t the only ones affected by oil and gas extraction. In recognition of the risk to people near drilling sites, the state of California recently established a law (SB 1137) requiring 3,200-foot minimum setbacks between future oil wells and dwellings, schools and other public buildings. The oil industry has vigorously opposed the law and has qualified its own referendum, negating AB 1137, for the next election .
While the circumstances of the Ecuador and California referendums are different, the overall thrust is the same. Oil interests are pushing hard to continue expanding their extraction while disregarding opposition from people concerned about the negative health and climate outcomes associated with oil and gas production.
Grove’s opinion piece doesn’t discuss the health and pollution problems associated with oil production, nor does it mention the economic benefits to be realized by the transition to clean energy. The benefits of the clean energy transition include new jobs in various economic sectors, such as solar and wind power installations, batteries, electrical grid enhancements, etc.
As the transition proceeds, there is also widespread recognition that oil workers should be given the opportunity to be retrained. Those wishing to keep doing the kind of work they are already doing can also be offered the opportunity to help plug the nearly 250,000 orphan oil wells in California still leaking greenhouse gases and abandoned by oil drilling companies.
An interesting aside is that one study estimates that the cost of sealing these orphan wells will exceed $21 billion, while the total future profits expected from California oil production are estimated to be only $6 billion (ProPublica, May 18, 2023). It seems likely, therefore, that taxpayers will ultimately be on the hook for these costs.
Even the oil companies know that the transition to clean energy is happening, and that it needs to accelerate to avoid the worst impacts brought about by climate change. There is also no serious scientific doubt that burning fossil fuels has been the primary cause of the planet warming that has resulted in natural disasters of increased severity.
At the next election, I suggest California voters follow the example of the people of Ecuador. Let us overwhelmingly vote against the oil industry referendum, and metaphorically consign it to one of those abandoned orphan wells, sealed off and rendered harmless.
And in doing so, say no to increased oil and gas production in California.
Ken Wall is a retired banker and bank regulator in Fresno, and is a local environmental advocate.
Read more at: https://www.fresnobee.com/opinion/readers-opinion/article279352109.html#storylink=cpy
